Open This for Something Long and Hard

open this for something long and hard
  1. Troy Foster says:
    Haha, we're doing that crap in class right now.
    Haha, we're doing that crap in class right now.
  2. Vanessa Khoo via Facebook says:
    math > ??
    math > ??
  3. Stephanie Victoria Berry via Facebook says:
    Long and hard unless you're Asian ;)
    Long and hard unless you're Asian ;)
  4. Zak Jones says:
    I'd be curious to know what the answer actually is. It looks like all of that is legible; any enlightened among us?
    I'd be curious to know what the answer actually is. It looks like all of that is legible; any enlightened among us?
  5. Shane Wilson says:
    IMPOSSIBRU!
    IMPOSSIBRU!
  6. Kristen Lewis says:
    I can't see any of the exponents :/ I doubt it's five though. From experience math problem writers like to use fractions. I think it's because they know I hate fractions.
    I can't see any of the exponents :/ I doubt it's five though. From experience math problem writers like to use fractions. I think it's because they know I hate fractions.
  7. Cory Camasta says:
    The answer would most likely contain the variable n.
    The answer would most likely contain the variable n.
  8. Snizzle Dizzle says:
    They look like theorems...don't know the names offhand but they aren't really solvable without some given values.
    They look like theorems...don't know the names offhand but they aren't really solvable without some given values.
  9. Bill Hardiman says:
    It's gonna be a case of "prove that *** = ***"...
    It's gonna be a case of "prove that *** = ***"...
  10. Bill Hardiman says:
    The awkward moment when you can prove all that mathematic, and it actually isn't 5...
    The awkward moment when you can prove all that mathematic, and it actually isn't 5...
  11. Pedro Rhymenoceros Chavarria says:
    Proofs are dildoes.
    Proofs are dildoes.
  12. Tiberiu Laticevschi says:
    I think the answer might be "qed".
    I think the answer might be "qed".
  13. Alexander Sergejev says:
    They are Functions (well the middle one definitely is (I would have to look at the graph of the other two to see for sure). They don't really have answers per say. You could either graph these, or solve them for specific values, but there are no "answers."
    They are Functions (well the middle one definitely is (I would have to look at the graph of the other two to see for sure). They don't really have answers per say. You could either graph these, or solve them for specific values, but there are no "answers."
  14. Bill Hardiman says:
    Alexander Sergejev The first and third ones will be "prove by mathematical induction that...", the second one is a cumulation, so you won't be able to plot a graph of it. There's no need to make yourself look even more stupid by replying.
    Alexander Sergejev The first and third ones will be "prove by mathematical induction that...", the second one is a cumulation, so you won't be able to plot a graph of it. There's no need to make yourself look even more stupid by replying.
  15. Zak Jones says:
    Bill Hardiman aaaaaaaand we have the first vengeful math geek of the thread.
    Bill Hardiman aaaaaaaand we have the first vengeful math geek of the thread.
  16. Alexander Sergejev says:
    Bill Hardiman You can't graph a function?! Are you serious? I'm sorry ... f(x) means what? For the other two, you aren't actually disagreeing. There is no single answer. You can show that the mathematical statements are true, and the easiest way to do that is to input values and test it. Perhaps there is some doctorate level way to prove it more theoretically but w/e.
    Bill Hardiman You can't graph a function?! Are you serious? I'm sorry ... f(x) means what? For the other two, you aren't actually disagreeing. There is no single answer. You can show that the mathematical statements are true, and the easiest way to do that is to input values and test it. Perhaps there is some doctorate level way to prove it more theoretically but w/e.
  17. Bill Hardiman says:
    Alexander Sergejev In terms of proving them, I'm not sure what level you failed at, but with a AS in maths, I can prove many such terms, using a technique called mathematical induction. As I have already said. And as for the graph, how about you plot a graph of the sum of the cubes of all real numbers. Enjoy! Whilst it is actually possible, it's a stupid idea to try.
    Alexander Sergejev In terms of proving them, I'm not sure what level you failed at, but with a AS in maths, I can prove many such terms, using a technique called mathematical induction. As I have already said. And as for the graph, how about you plot a graph of the sum of the cubes of all real numbers. Enjoy! Whilst it is actually possible, it's a stupid idea to try.
  18. Alexander Sergejev says:
    Went no further than differential equations myself.
    Went no further than differential equations myself.
  19. Neel Shah says:
    You guys are all dumb... the asian has already spoken, the answer is 5!
    You guys are all dumb... the asian has already spoken, the answer is 5!