What You Think, What You Say
-
If that's what you think, I think you are a sociopath.If that's what you think, I think you are a sociopath.
-
This is so me!This is so me!
-
If that's what you think, I think you are a sociopath.If that's what you think, I think you are a sociopath.
-
Or an artist, but honestly the line between the two is thin.Or an artist, but honestly the line between the two is thin.
-
Holy shiz.. This is pretty much exactly me. Except I talk a fuckload more.Holy shiz.. This is pretty much exactly me. Except I talk a fuckload more.
-
this is so me! genius whoever made this.this is so me! genius whoever made this.
-
What you say:"Oh man! I am tripping balls."What you say:"Oh man! I am tripping balls."
-
Livia Di Lella e questo è uno simile.Livia Di Lella e questo è uno simile.
-
I drew this! Wish I would have put a watermark, it's been stolen all over the place. -.-I drew this! Wish I would have put a watermark, it's been stolen all over the place. -.-
-
I drew this! Wish I would have put a watermark, it's been stolen all over the place. -.-I drew this! Wish I would have put a watermark, it's been stolen all over the place. -.-
-
Strangely, somebody I know draws this when she's on the phone but on when I asked her to draw something like it again, it looked nothing like it. xDStrangely, somebody I know draws this when she's on the phone but on when I asked her to draw something like it again, it looked nothing like it. xD
-
Strangely, somebody I know draws this when she's on the phone but on when I asked her to draw something like it again, it looked nothing like it. xDStrangely, somebody I know draws this when she's on the phone but on when I asked her to draw something like it again, it looked nothing like it. xD
-
YES. Words cannot fully describe our thoughts. When we invent a method of transmitting our thoughts to one another, we will reach a new level of EPIC STORY TIME.YES. Words cannot fully describe our thoughts. When we invent a method of transmitting our thoughts to one another, we will reach a new level of EPIC STORY TIME.
-
a sociopath is someone who does not feel remorse....not entirely sure what you were going for with that comment...a sociopath is someone who does not feel remorse....not entirely sure what you were going for with that comment...
-
Sociopathy is, quite literally, what you just said. Sociopathy is also related to natural disregard to social interaction. I am just loosely using the "creative" part of it as a punch line to remark how, albeit completely able to formulate and communicate ideas, you chose to do not so. Sociopathy is not just about "No remorse", it's about just not caring at all (which translates into no remorse), which is a way more abstract (hence abusable) concepto. Not the funniest of jokes, I admit, but then again not the deepest of works, either.Sociopathy is, quite literally, what you just said. Sociopathy is also related to natural disregard to social interaction. I am just loosely using the "creative" part of it as a punch line to remark how, albeit completely able to formulate and communicate ideas, you chose to do not so. Sociopathy is not just about "No remorse", it's about just not caring at all (which translates into no remorse), which is a way more abstract (hence abusable) concepto. Not the funniest of jokes, I admit, but then again not the deepest of works, either.
-
still that doesn't quite relate to this piece. Sociopathy does not have anything to do with holding in what you're thinking and remaining silent. And I'm not sure how "not caring at all" or even not having remorse has anything to do with the picture. The drawing does not imply the ability to formulate and communicate ideas either.still that doesn't quite relate to this piece. Sociopathy does not have anything to do with holding in what you're thinking and remaining silent. And I'm not sure how "not caring at all" or even not having remorse has anything to do with the picture. The drawing does not imply the ability to formulate and communicate ideas either.
-
It doesn't? I am pretty sure it does... I mean, this is my train of thought: Original idea: "Just because I shut my mouth doesn't mean I have an empty mind". Fair enough. But the implication on it is that, in fact, you DO have ideas, hence you need to be able to formulate them. Not brilliant ones, necessarily, just loads them. If you take a twist on that, you decidedly chose not to communicate (most likely because of being shy, or for whatever aesthetical reason you may fancy). You can just as easily assume it is because you disregard human interaction and exchange of ideas, not because you can't, but because you do not care about them. One (of at least three) required 'traits' (for lack of a better word) you need to fulfill to be considered one is: "Incapacity to maintain enduring relationships, though having no difficulty in establishing them." Which CAN be assumed (or [verb] for 'Prejudice') without any scientific rigor based on previous elaboration. So, in the end, I just used freedom of interpretation over a piece to actively disregard its most obvious meaning for something more twisted and far-fetched. I found this giggles inducing BEFORE having to elaborate on it, now not so much. You just killed the joke for me, lame as it might be. Or not... I still giggle a little. Not sure, really.It doesn't? I am pretty sure it does... I mean, this is my train of thought: Original idea: "Just because I shut my mouth doesn't mean I have an empty mind". Fair enough. But the implication on it is that, in fact, you DO have ideas, hence you need to be able to formulate them. Not brilliant ones, necessarily, just loads them. If you take a twist on that, you decidedly chose not to communicate (most likely because of being shy, or for whatever aesthetical reason you may fancy). You can just as easily assume it is because you disregard human interaction and exchange of ideas, not because you can't, but because you do not care about them. One (of at least three) required 'traits' (for lack of a better word) you need to fulfill to be considered one is: "Incapacity to maintain enduring relationships, though having no difficulty in establishing them." Which CAN be assumed (or [verb] for 'Prejudice') without any scientific rigor based on previous elaboration. So, in the end, I just used freedom of interpretation over a piece to actively disregard its most obvious meaning for something more twisted and far-fetched. I found this giggles inducing BEFORE having to elaborate on it, now not so much. You just killed the joke for me, lame as it might be. Or not... I still giggle a little. Not sure, really.
-
it's funny because you render yourself as a smart individual, which is obvious by the vocabulary and phrasing you use. but that entire paragraph completely lacks meaning and rationality at all. I refuse to argue with such an arrogant, self-obsessed idiot. The only argument I can provide is that pretty much every sentence you wrote is wrong. You can't just assume one CHOOSES not to communicate because he or she is not speaking. You're an idiot.it's funny because you render yourself as a smart individual, which is obvious by the vocabulary and phrasing you use. but that entire paragraph completely lacks meaning and rationality at all. I refuse to argue with such an arrogant, self-obsessed idiot. The only argument I can provide is that pretty much every sentence you wrote is wrong. You can't just assume one CHOOSES not to communicate because he or she is not speaking. You're an idiot.
-
I fail to see how I offended you. I fail to give a fuck, too, but I seriously fail to see what did I do or say to warrant your ... displease? Again, it was a joke. Arguably not a funny one to you, but I still don't see how that warrants both the time you took to reply to it days later and how offended you got by it. I mean no internet-emotional harm. All I said was for fun and with no evil intent. Also, yes. I can assume freely whatever it is I want to assume. The image leaves one plenty of space for assumption, but I grow tired of this argument. And FYI, I *am* a smart individual. My mommy says so, and experience has taught me that she's never wrong.I fail to see how I offended you. I fail to give a fuck, too, but I seriously fail to see what did I do or say to warrant your ... displease? Again, it was a joke. Arguably not a funny one to you, but I still don't see how that warrants both the time you took to reply to it days later and how offended you got by it. I mean no internet-emotional harm. All I said was for fun and with no evil intent. Also, yes. I can assume freely whatever it is I want to assume. The image leaves one plenty of space for assumption, but I grow tired of this argument. And FYI, I *am* a smart individual. My mommy says so, and experience has taught me that she's never wrong.
-
That sucks.That sucks.
-
Agreed.... On so many levels..Agreed.... On so many levels..
-
Agreed.... On so many levels..Agreed.... On so many levels..